Member-only story
Dependency Inversion Principle VS Dependency Injection
Understanding the difference between the Dependency inversion principle and the Dependency injection using ASP.NET Core

In the realm of object-oriented programming, the principles of Dependency Inversion (DI) and Dependency Injection (DI) play pivotal roles in achieving maintainable, scalable, and loosely coupled code. In C#, these principles are fundamental for writing robust and testable applications. Let’s delve into these concepts, understand their significance, and explore practical examples in C#.
Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
Dependency Inversion is a principle proposed by Robert C. Martin (Uncle Bob) as part of the SOLID principles. It suggests that high-level modules should not depend on low-level modules; both should depend on abstractions. Abstractions should not depend on details; details should depend on abstractions.
In simpler terms, this principle emphasizes:
- Abstraction over concrete implementations: It promotes defining interfaces or abstract classes to decouple high-level modules from low-level implementation details.
- Inverting the direction of dependency: Instead of classes depending directly on other concrete classes, they depend on interfaces or abstractions.
Consider a scenario where a BusinessLogic
class directly depends on a DataAccess
class:
public class BusinessLogic
{
private readonly DataAccess _dataAccess;
public BusinessLogic()
{
_dataAccess = new DataAccess();
}
// Methods using _dataAccess
}
This tight coupling makes the BusinessLogic
class reliant on the DataAccess
class, making it difficult to substitute or test different implementations of the DataAccess
.
By adhering to the Dependency Inversion Principle, we can refactor this code:
public interface IDataAccess
{
// Method signatures
}
public class DataAccess : IDataAccess
{
// Implement methods
}
public class BusinessLogic
{
private readonly IDataAccess _dataAccess;
public BusinessLogic(IDataAccess dataAccess)
{
_dataAccess =…